This is the latest in a series of posts that will re-cap our fortnightly research catchups. We hold these meetings at the QUT Kelvin Grove campus, and they are open to anyone at QUT interested in Generative AI related research. Contact the lab (genailab@qut.edu.au) if you would like to be added to our mailing list for the meetings.
Our current meeting format (subject to change, and dependent on fortnightly volunteers to fill each section!) includes three sections;
- A discussion of some recent news-worth event pertaining to GenAI
- A gentle explainer for some term or concept in the GenAI research literature, and
- A share of someone’s in-progress or recently published research work on GenAI
FYI, these posts will also be co-produced with the assistance of various GenAI tools!
This week’s GenAI research catchup our own Aaron Snoswell sharing on the new ‘Prompt Caching’ feature available in Anthropic’s Claude models, and Michael Dezuanni sharing a recent findings on GenAI literacy from the Adult Media Literacy survey.
Prompt Caching with Aaron Snoswell
Adult GenAI Literacy with Michael Dezuanni
Prof. Michael Dezuanni from QUT shared findings from this year’s adult media literacy survey, where nearly 4,000 adult Australians revealed surprising insights into the adoption and perception of generative AI tools. Despite the buzz surrounding AI, only about 40% of respondents reported using text-based AI services, with a mere 16% having experience with AI image generators. The primary motivation for those who did engage with AI was curiosity, followed by a desire to simplify work or study tasks. Interestingly, the survey uncovered significant disparities in AI usage and attitudes across different demographic groups. Younger, more educated individuals living in metropolitan areas were far more likely to use and have positive sentiments towards AI compared to older, less educated, or rural populations.
The survey also highlighted a general wariness towards AI among Australians. Only 7% of respondents agreed that generative AI is exciting and would improve their lives, while just 14% expressed a strong interest in learning more about AI tools. These findings suggest a notable gap between the hype surrounding AI and its actual adoption and perception by the general public. Furthermore, the research team observed that the patterns of digital inclusion and exclusion seen with previous technologies are being replicated with AI, raising concerns about the potential for AI to exacerbate existing social and economic divides. As AI becomes more integrated into everyday software and workplaces, addressing these disparities in access and literacy will be crucial to ensure equitable participation in an AI-driven future.